Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Carolyn Campana vs Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Campana vs Elkin analysis and find out who is favored!
Carolyn Campana vs Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Campana 1 - 0 Elkin
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Campana has won 46.74% of points on their second serve, while Elkin has won 41.07%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Campana, in recent form, has won 58.93% of their opponent's second serve points, while Elkin has won 52.57%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.71% and 34.44% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Campana has saved 48.41% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Elkin has saved 46.88% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Campana has won 48.39% of matches played (W/L 15/ 16), with Elkin winning 35.56% (W/L 16/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Campana has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 4/ 4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5). Elkin has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 16/ 22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Campana has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 8/ 10), where as Elkin has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 39.47% of matches (W/L 15/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Campana winning 1 times and Elkin being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Campana winning 2 and Elkin winning 0. The last match between Campana and Elkin was at the W15 Brossard, 05-03-2024, First, I.hard with Carolyn Campana getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:8:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Campana and Elkin have played a deciding set 0 times, with Campana winning 0 times and Elkin 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Campana winning 0, and Elkin 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Campana has played against opponents with an average rank of 155.77 while Elkin has played against players with an average rank of 72.84.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Campana has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Elkin has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Campana has converted 44.03% of breakpoint opportunities, and Elkin has converted 51.82% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
44% (20-25)
Career Total W/L
36% (26-47)
53% (10-9)
YTD W/L
39% (9-14)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Carolyn Campana vs Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Campana VS Elkin
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Carolyn Campana | Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:8:0 | 1:8:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 79% (38/48) | 52% (22/42) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (28/38) | 50% (11/22) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (5/10) | 30% (6/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (5/5) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 60% (25/42) | 31% (15/48) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Carolyn Campana
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Carolyn Campana | Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (10/9) | 39% (9/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (21/19) | 42% (21/29) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (187/180) | 47% (197/221) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 57% (8/6) | 44% (4/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 42% (5/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.09 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 16 | 23 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0.65 |
| DFs Total | 28 | 132 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:37 | 1:14:36 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 133.89 | 56.65 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (716/992) | 56% (630/1127) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (412/716) | 60% (378/630) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (129/276) | 41% (206/497) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (70/159) | 52% (57/110) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (521/1071) | 42% (450/1059) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 44% (4/5) | 45% (9/11) |
| Futures W/L | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (10/19) | 39% (9/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 25% (1/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (9/9) | 82% (11/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (9/0) | 18% (11/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 0% (12/0) |
Carolyn Campana Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Basak Eraydin
Player
Carolyn Campana
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolyn Campana
Player
Klara Kosan
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Maya Iyengar
Player
Carolyn Campana
49%
(
38 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carolyn Campana
Player
Dasha Ivanova
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
74%
(
42 of
57)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
0
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
48%
(
37 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carolyn Campana
Player
Anna Frey
75%
(
71 of
95)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
92)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
48%
(
46 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
52 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolyn Campana
Player
Bronte Murgett
74%
(
65 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
52 of
78)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
42%
(
37 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
92
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anita Sahdiieva
Player
Carolyn Campana
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve %
82%
(
18 of
22)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
47%
(
7 of
15)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
20
Total Points Won
20
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rhea Verma
Player
Carolyn Campana
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jessie Aney
Player
Carolyn Campana
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carolyn Campana
Player
Ana Grubor
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Saumya Vig
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
74)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
18
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
34%
(
12 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
51%
(
40 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
78
|
2-6 6-2 12-10 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zoe Hitt
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paris Corley
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
Player
Sabastiani Leon
52%
(
36 of
69)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
41%
(
13 of
32)
1st Serve %
38%
(
17 of
45)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
8
77%
(
10 of
13)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
10 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sarah Victoria Majesty Nita
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
46%
(
32 of
69)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
59)
-
Aces
-
10
Double Faults
13
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
8 of
34)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
49%
(
34 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Cadence Brace
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve %
38%
(
23 of
60)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
Player
Katja Markus
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
39%
(
17 of
44)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
21 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Campana Vs Elkin Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Campana are available here and Elkin photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
